I

Company profile · Logistics and warehousing

Calder & Hume Distribution

Logistics and warehousing · estimated 600 staff · one entity, resolved

44

Below standard · 40–59

Low confidence · 8 reports · 3 verified · est. 600 staff · 1 October 2024 – 30 September 2026 · T3 4 · T3-R 1 · T2 3 · T1 3 · T0 2 · rubric v1.2

8 reports from an estimated 600 staff — 1.3% of the workforce.

Low confidence — not for citation

Status

On Watch — active documented Adverse Flag within 12 months (Federal Court orders, 7 April 2026).

The composite unit

The confidence, the counted reports, the verified count and the estimated headcount are part of this number the way a decimal point is part of a number. They are never stripped, never abbreviated and never separated from the figure. If a surface cannot carry the whole unit, that surface shows no number at all.

Calder & Hume Distribution did not apply for this score

Calder & Hume Distribution did not apply for this score, earn it or receive it as an award, and it cannot display it. There is no seal, no certificate and no badge. The score is imposed on every employer we can evidence, and it is universal.

II

Flags · T3 documentary evidence only

Every flag rests on a document.

A flag may rest only on the public record — a court, tribunal or regulator finding, a statutory register, or something the company published or filed itself. Every string below carries its source and its date inside the string, because a screenshot strips everything around it.

Adverse and Favourable are told apart by form, never by hue

Filled tag and solid spine against outlined tag and hatched spine, plus the words themselves. Both are set in the same ink, so the distinction survives a black-and-white print.

Nothing that rests on worker reports appears in this section.

Adverse flags · 4

Adverse flag · Documented

Documented — Federal Court orders, 7 April 2026: penalties imposed for failure to keep employee records for 31 employees over two years.

Criterion · record-keeping contraventions established by a court

Adverse flag · Documented

Documented — regulator infringement notice, 22 June 2026: casual conversion requests not responded to within the statutory period.

Criterion · statutory response deadline missed on casual conversion

Adverse flag · Documented

Documented — company announcement, 1 September 2026: site closure notified to 84 employees with 11 days notice.

Criterion · closure notified inside the consultation period

Adverse flag · Documented

Documented — safety regulator prohibition notice, 3 August 2026: mechanical handling equipment withdrawn from service at the Altona site.

Criterion · prohibition notice served on plant in active use

Favourable flags · none

No favourable flag is published for this employer. An absent flag is an absence of evidence in the public record, and is never displayed as a finding either way.

III

Pillar breakdown · Eight pillars, canonical order

Eight pillars, each with its own sample.

Length is quantity and form is confidence. The ink never changes, so no pillar is coloured better or worse than another. A pillar below its reporting threshold shows no number at any size or in any tone.

  1. 48

    Flexibility & Work Location

    Weight 12 of 100

    Low confidence

    7 reports in this pillar

  2. 40

    Pay & Reward Integrity

    Weight 18 of 100

    Low confidence

    7 reports in this pillar

  3. 38

    Job Security & Workforce Practices

    Weight 16 of 100

    Low confidence

    6 reports in this pillar

  4. Not enough reports

    Management Quality

    Weight 12 of 100

    Below threshold

    4 reports in this pillar

  5. Not enough reports

    Workload & Wellbeing

    Weight 14 of 100

    Below threshold

    3 reports in this pillar

  6. 54

    Hiring Conduct

    Weight 8 of 100

    Low confidence

    5 reports in this pillar

  7. Not enough reports

    Fair Treatment & Voice

    Weight 12 of 100

    Below threshold

    2 reports in this pillar

  8. 52

    Ethics & Transparency

    Weight 8 of 100

    Low confidence

    5 reports in this pillar

IV

Public record · T3 Documented, T3-R Reported

The record, with the source inside every string.

T3 Documented originates a flag. T3-R Reported is somebody else’s reporting: it may corroborate, date or locate a T3 artefact, and it may never stand in for one.

  • T3 — Federal Court orders, 7 April 2026: record-keeping penalties, 31 employees.
  • T3 — Regulator infringement notice, 22 June 2026: casual conversion.
  • T3 — Safety regulator prohibition notice, 3 August 2026: Altona site.
  • T3 — Company announcement, 1 September 2026: site closure, 84 employees, 11 days notice.
  • T3-R — Reported by The Daily Ledger, 9 April 2026 — corroborates the Court orders and does not originate a flag.

V

What we don’t know · Absence is displayed, never inferred

A thin record is a thin record, never a clean bill.

What is missing is published in the same place as what is present. An absence of evidence is never rendered as a good result.

The gaps in this profile

  • Three pillars are not scored. Management Quality, Workload & Wellbeing and Fair Treatment & Voice are all below their reporting thresholds, so no number publishes for any of them and their weights are not counted in the number above.
  • 8 counted reports at an employer estimated at 600 staff is 1.3% of the workforce. The score publishes with Low confidence attached and is marked not for citation.
  • Three of the eight reports are verified. The rest are signed-in or anonymous.

VI

Right of reply · Free, permanent, unpaid, published verbatim

Invited to reply, and no reply received.

Every company gets a free, permanent right of reply. The invitation is dated and logged whether or not it is taken up, and silence is recorded as silence rather than read as agreement.

Calder & Hume Distribution was invited to reply on 8 October 2026 and has not replied. The reply slot stays open permanently and the reply publishes here unedited whenever it arrives.

VII

Alternatives · Companies like this one

A number is no use to anyone without somewhere else to go.

Comparables are matched on sector and size band, and each carries its own complete unit.

Names only, never logos

There are no affiliate links, and the selection criteria are published so the comparison can be checked rather than trusted. A company with too few reports appears as it is, with no number at all, rather than being quietly left out.

ACME Pty Ltd

62

Fair · 60–74

Moderate confidence · 14 reports · 6 verified · est. 900 staff · 1 October 2024 – 30 September 2026 · T3 5 · T3-R 2 · T2 6 · T1 6 · T0 2 · rubric v1.2

14 reports from an estimated 900 staff — 1.6% of the workforce.

Northwind Logistics

71

Fair · 60–74

High confidence · 88 reports · 54 verified · est. 1,200 staff · 1 October 2024 – 30 September 2026 · T3 4 · T3-R 1 · T2 54 · T1 26 · T0 8 · rubric v1.2

88 reports from an estimated 1,200 staff — 7.3% of the workforce.

Baynard Group

Not enough worker reports to publish a score yet

Insufficient confidence · est. 1,500 staff · 1 October 2024 – 30 September 2026

VIII

Method and caveats · Rubric v1.2

What produced this number, and what it cannot tell you.

The method is published in advance, in full, and every change to it is published before it takes effect.

The method behind this profile

  • Counted reports: 8. Verified: 3. Evidence window: 1 October 2024 – 30 September 2026. Rubric v1.2.
  • Tier mix: T3 4 · T3-R 1 · T2 3 · T1 3 · T0 2. The 8 counted reports are the T2, T1 and T0 rows (3 + 3 + 2); the T3 and T3-R rows are the five public-record items.
  • Publication cohort. 1 July – 30 September 2026, published 8 October 2026. A cohort is frozen at publication and its denominator is never quietly restated.
  • Response rate. 8 reports at an employer estimated at 600 staff is 1.3% of the workforce.
  • Self-selection. Workers who choose to report are not a random sample of the workforce.
  • Movement between quarters is shown as band movement, never as point deltas.
  • Pillar weights sum to 100 and are fixed for the life of rubric v1.x. A pillar below its reporting threshold leaves both sides of the calculation — its weight is not counted and it is not scored as a zero — so this number is the weight-weighted mean of the 5 pillars above that did score.